It’s strange how the time and place of your birth can influence your destiny. Ponder for a moment what it would have been like to be born at a time that saw a fledging federation of Australia emerge in the early 20th century.
Imagine living in a time where communication was mainly face to face or by letters written in ink – no mobile phones, no internet, no television. Life was harder, without all the modern conveniences of now, and some would argue that life was much simpler. Nationalism and patriotism were in their infancy. At this time Australia was still tied to the umbilical cord of England and lacking a truly independent identity.
It was not surprising then, that so many young men and women signed up to join the armed forces when Britain declared war in 1914. It was a time when one did not question one’s duty; one simply did what was expected. As in Alfred Lord Tennyson’s famous poem, “The Charge of the Light Brigade”, it was a different era:
"Forward, the Light Brigade!"
Was there a man dismay'd?
Not tho' the soldier knew
Someone had blunder'd:
Theirs not to make reply,
Theirs not to reason why,
Theirs but to do and die:
Into the valley of Death
Rode the six hundred.
In 1917, Australia had a population of a mere 5 million people, scattered over a vast landscape between rural and urban areas. The only means of international transport was a sea journey, which to Britain took two months and even transport within the country was painfully slow.
Over 60,000 men and women died in World War 1. What hopes and dreams did these 60,000 people have? What aspirations lived in their hearts for a better life for them and their families? Ross McMullin (The Weekend Australian, Review 21-22 April, 2012) wrote recently about a few of these men killed at Gallipoli.
Bob Bage, an engineer from Victoria who was an invaluable member of Douglas Mawson’s expedition to Antarctica was killed at Gallipoli, after surviving in the most terrible of circumstances in Antarctica. What might have become of this amazing man had he survived WW1?
Gordon Mathison, an internationally renowned medical scientist was fatally wounded, at 31 years of age at Gallipoli. Would he have been another great medical scientist like Professor Ian Frazer?
Alexander Turnbull, a West Australian Rhodes scholar, was another outstanding young Australian who was destined for great heights in law or politics and at 27 years of age was cut down in his prime at Gallipoli. Ted Larkin, a rugby international who was an up and rising star in politics was killed in Gallipoli aged 35. Would Turnbull and Larkin have become great politicians or Prime Ministers even? We will never know.
There are 60,000 Australian stories of lives cut short in defence of our precious country – some of these 60,000 were great people with unfulfilled destines. Many of the 60,000 though, were just ordinary people like you and me and were thrust into extraordinary circumstances by history. The time and place of their birth determined their destiny in life – to become heroes, forever immortalised by Anzac Day.
None of these people set out to be heroes. They were not particularly well trained nor particularly well resourced. They were however extraordinary men and women because they served and fought for the freedom of all Australian and New Zealanders.
60,000 Australians died in World War 1 and many more have died since protecting our freedom and way of life. Anzac Day is one special day when we honour their memory. In a way they do live on in our collective memories each year when we pause to remember them.
‘Lest We Forget’
All that remains, now that the last of the ANZACs has died, are the medals that honour their memory. This poem written by Clyde Hamilton: is a moving salute to our heroes, called:
Not a Hero
The ANZAC Day march was over - the old Digger had done his best.
His body ached from marching - it was time to sit and rest.
He made his way to a park bench and sat with lowered head.
A young boy passing saw him - approached and politely said,
"Please sir do you mind if I ask you what the medals you wear are for?
Did you get them for being a hero, when fighting in a war?"
Startled, the old Digger moved over and beckoned the boy to sit.
Eagerly the lad accepted - he had not expected this!
"First of all I was not a hero," said the old Digger in solemn tone,
"But I served with many heroes, the ones that never came home.
So when you talk of heroes, it's important to understand,
The greatest of all heroes gave their lives defending this land.
"The medals are worn in their honour, as a symbol of respect.
All diggers wear them on ANZAC Day - it shows they don't forget."
The old digger then climbed to his feet and asked the boy to stand.
Carefully he removed the medals and placed them in his hand.
He told him he could keep them - to treasure throughout his life,
A legacy of a kind - left behind - paid for in sacrifice.
Overwhelmed the young boy was speechless - he couldn’t find words to say.
It was there the old Digger left him - going quietly on his way.
In the distance the young boy glimpsed him - saw him turn and wave goodbye.
Saddened he sat alone on the bench - tears welled in his eyes.
He never again saw him ever - but still remembers with pride,
When the old Digger told him of Heroes and a young boy sat and cried.
Lest We Forget
Karon Graham
For those with a passion for Education, Curriculum, Learning, Technology and Innovation, Leadership, Motivation, Insights into books and topics that matter and the very latest in research.
Monday, April 23, 2012
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Implications of the New Gonski Model for School Funding
“I want to begin by saying that education funding in Australia
can be characterised as a dog’s breakfast.”
(Education Minister Peter Garrett)
This is perhaps not Minister Peter Garrett’s most eloquent quote about the current nature of funding for schools, but it does convey something of the complexity of the current funding arrangements.
Earlier this week, I was asked in a radio interview about how independent schools might be affected by the proposed recommendations of the Gonski Review of Funding for Schools. While there is a simple response to this question, there is also a longer and more complicated response. The simple response is, “It depends”.
The new Gonski model of recurrent funding by both the Australian government and state and territory governments is to be based on a new Schooling Resource Standard (SRS). Interestingly, Gonski has worked this new Schooling Resource Standard to be very similar to the current model, which is based on $8000 per student in the primary sector and $10,500 per student in the secondary sector.
Very few independent schools in Queensland would be worse off with the new model – only the largest and wealthiest of schools in Brisbane, for example. In Victoria and New South Wales there is a larger percentage of wealthier independent schools that would be worse off with the new funding model.
For many Queensland independent schools, like Caloundra City Private School, (based on the recommended Gonski model), there would be an increase in recurrent funding depending upon a number of different factors. Each factor is given a loading that increases the level of recurrent funding dependent upon the following factors which are sourced from the data on MySchool:
• the socio-economic background of parents – based on parents’ occupation and level of education – the higher the socio-economic background the smaller the loading, the lower the socio-economic background the higher the loading
• school location and size - for example: large metropolitan schools (no loading), provincial, remote or very remote schools that are small receive increasingly significant loading with greater remoteness and smaller size; and
• schools with student populations of greater disadvantage - for example, a high proportion of non-English speaking families, or indigenous students or students with disabilities will result in higher loadings.
For Caloundra City Private School, based on 2009 data and all of these factors, the School would be entitled to an 11percent increase in our recurrent funding under the new model, meaning that we would be better off with the new model. But (and this is a big BUT), the governments (federal and state) would need to find another $5billion to fund the new model for all schools. In truth, neither federal nor state governments have the necessary funds to finance (in the short term anyway), this additional $5 billion. As Bill Daniels, Executive Director of Independent Schools Australia commented in an interview reported in The Age, Feb 24, 2012:
“The biggest obstacle won’t emerge from within the schooling sector, it will come from Commonwealth-state relations. The Gonski funding model requires a big injection of funding from both levels of government. In a tight fiscal environment a commitment to significant extra funds across nine governments is a big ask.”
Historically, government funding to all schools, has been determined by different models which have lasted on average for between twelve to sixteen years. The current model of funding will be in its twelfth year when it is due to end in 2013. Given the change of government in Queensland and likely changes in government elsewhere, it is highly unlikely that any agreement would be reached by federal and state governments by the 2013 expiry date. Because of this factor alone, it would be more likely that the federal government would simply legislate to extend the current school funding arrangements for at least two to three years. In other words, while there might be general agreement that the new Gonski model would result in greater equity and fairness for school funding, it is not going to see the ‘light of day’ until federal and state governments agree on how it is to be funded.
The media likes to polarise debate on funding to independent schools versus public schools and the politicisation of the debate means that many misconceptions surround school funding. As I pointed out in the radio interview, parents of independent schools pay twice – once when they pay taxes, which help fund all schools and secondly when they pay school fees. Parents in independent schools also make significant contribution to independent schools through the fund raising efforts of the Parents and Friends’ Associations and through other generous donations in dollars or in kind. Parents in independent schools are making an important investment in their child’s future.
Karon Graham
can be characterised as a dog’s breakfast.”
(Education Minister Peter Garrett)
This is perhaps not Minister Peter Garrett’s most eloquent quote about the current nature of funding for schools, but it does convey something of the complexity of the current funding arrangements.
Earlier this week, I was asked in a radio interview about how independent schools might be affected by the proposed recommendations of the Gonski Review of Funding for Schools. While there is a simple response to this question, there is also a longer and more complicated response. The simple response is, “It depends”.
The new Gonski model of recurrent funding by both the Australian government and state and territory governments is to be based on a new Schooling Resource Standard (SRS). Interestingly, Gonski has worked this new Schooling Resource Standard to be very similar to the current model, which is based on $8000 per student in the primary sector and $10,500 per student in the secondary sector.
Very few independent schools in Queensland would be worse off with the new model – only the largest and wealthiest of schools in Brisbane, for example. In Victoria and New South Wales there is a larger percentage of wealthier independent schools that would be worse off with the new funding model.
For many Queensland independent schools, like Caloundra City Private School, (based on the recommended Gonski model), there would be an increase in recurrent funding depending upon a number of different factors. Each factor is given a loading that increases the level of recurrent funding dependent upon the following factors which are sourced from the data on MySchool:
• the socio-economic background of parents – based on parents’ occupation and level of education – the higher the socio-economic background the smaller the loading, the lower the socio-economic background the higher the loading
• school location and size - for example: large metropolitan schools (no loading), provincial, remote or very remote schools that are small receive increasingly significant loading with greater remoteness and smaller size; and
• schools with student populations of greater disadvantage - for example, a high proportion of non-English speaking families, or indigenous students or students with disabilities will result in higher loadings.
For Caloundra City Private School, based on 2009 data and all of these factors, the School would be entitled to an 11percent increase in our recurrent funding under the new model, meaning that we would be better off with the new model. But (and this is a big BUT), the governments (federal and state) would need to find another $5billion to fund the new model for all schools. In truth, neither federal nor state governments have the necessary funds to finance (in the short term anyway), this additional $5 billion. As Bill Daniels, Executive Director of Independent Schools Australia commented in an interview reported in The Age, Feb 24, 2012:
“The biggest obstacle won’t emerge from within the schooling sector, it will come from Commonwealth-state relations. The Gonski funding model requires a big injection of funding from both levels of government. In a tight fiscal environment a commitment to significant extra funds across nine governments is a big ask.”
Historically, government funding to all schools, has been determined by different models which have lasted on average for between twelve to sixteen years. The current model of funding will be in its twelfth year when it is due to end in 2013. Given the change of government in Queensland and likely changes in government elsewhere, it is highly unlikely that any agreement would be reached by federal and state governments by the 2013 expiry date. Because of this factor alone, it would be more likely that the federal government would simply legislate to extend the current school funding arrangements for at least two to three years. In other words, while there might be general agreement that the new Gonski model would result in greater equity and fairness for school funding, it is not going to see the ‘light of day’ until federal and state governments agree on how it is to be funded.
The media likes to polarise debate on funding to independent schools versus public schools and the politicisation of the debate means that many misconceptions surround school funding. As I pointed out in the radio interview, parents of independent schools pay twice – once when they pay taxes, which help fund all schools and secondly when they pay school fees. Parents in independent schools also make significant contribution to independent schools through the fund raising efforts of the Parents and Friends’ Associations and through other generous donations in dollars or in kind. Parents in independent schools are making an important investment in their child’s future.
Karon Graham
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? Food for Thought.
"For most of life, nothing wonderful happens. If you don't enjoy getting up and working and finishing your work and sitting down to a meal with family or friends, then the chances are that you're not going to be very happy. If someone bases his [or her] happiness or unhappiness on major events like a great new job, huge amounts of money, a flawlessly happy marriage or a trip to Paris, that person isn't going to be happy much of the time."
(Andy Rooney)
Some people dream of being rich and famous, believing that all their heart’s desire will come to fruition. But does great wealth bring true happiness and contentment? One only has to scan the latest headlines here in Australia to find that great wealth and fame do not bring happiness -far from it - families can be torn apart by disputes about who should ‘have what’ in controversial and hotly contested wills and family trusts.
History’s pages reveal a litany of woes that have descended upon families of great wealth – everything from depression, suicide, murder and loss of fortune by careless or misguided spending or investments. It seems that having great wealth does not necessarily bring happiness like the fairytale life we dream about. While many of you may concede this point, I’m sure that one or two of you are thinking that ‘money can’t buy happiness, but it sure makes misery easier to live with’.
Most of us are lucky enough to have enough money to live comfortably without wanting for too much in our lives. Our happiness stems from our family and friends, our work and our leisure time and while we may still dream of winning that elusive Gold Lotto, or inheriting some fortune from a very distant relative, the reality is that we are happy enough with what we have.
Unfortunately, not everyone is in this fortunate position. It may surprise you to know that there are some people who live not far from us on the Sunshine Coast who are disadvantaged in very real terms. These people may be disadvantaged by one or more of the following factors: low income, no car, no family, physical disability, limited access to transport or health services or educational opportunities.
Of the 300,000 or so people living on the Sunshine Coast, there are according to the 2010 report from Uniting Care, Centre for Social Justice, around 20 percent of householders on the Sunshine Coast receiving less than $500 per week. One parent explained in her own words what this is like:
“We can’t support ourselves. Where I live cost $250 a fortnight. I only get $420 in unemployment benefit. How am I suppose to support myself and my kids in a house with that amount of money? I struggle to eat.”

On the Sunshine Coast, approximately 15 percent of families suffer unemployment. Children are often caught in desperate situations because of their parents’ circumstances and often these children live in single parent families. One person explained how they coped growing up as a child in poverty:
“I hid my poverty by never telling anyone where I lived and by never inviting anyone home.”
The elderly living on a pension are often caught in poverty. They worry about money constantly and coping is very stressful for them. They wonder whether they will have enough to get by each week. As one elderly man put it:
“I can afford ‘basics’ but I can’t afford new clothing. I don’t have enough money to go out. I worry about how I’m going to cope in the future.”
The really sad part of growing old, one man said, was that you become invisible.
“You are no longer worth anything when you are old. People don’t even see you anymore. When I walk down the street, no-one ever says ‘hello’. Some days I wait out the front of my flat, until the postman comes to the letterbox, so I can talk to him. He may be the only person I talk to some weeks.”
The people who are most disadvantaged are the elderly, the disabled, those on a pension, the unemployed, single parents and the very young born into families who are disadvantaged. Some of these families live in rented houses, but many others live in temporary accommodation – moving from one flat to another, or live in caravans, or cars, homeless shelters or at worse, on the streets and in parks.
On the Sunshine Coast, according to a specially commissioned Sunshine Coast Regional Council 2006 report, about 1700 people or more are homeless. About 1000 of these homeless people, live in caravan parks.
Disadvantaged people can live in desperate circumstances – some of their own making - but often in many other cases, it’s a result of loss of income, mental illness, or physical disabilities which makes it difficult to find or keep work and in some very sad cases, a combination of many of these factors. Despair, depression, worry, anxiety, hopelessness, hunger and stress are the emotional struggles of the disadvantaged.
There are certain times of the year, when poverty and disadvantage are more painful and stressful. Christmas and Easter are particularly difficult for disadvantaged families, where children are the ones who feel it more deeply. Many parents may try and protect children from their dire financial circumstances. One parent wrote:
“At Christmas, we came home with $14 in our pocket. We sat around and made a game of cutting out decorations to put on the Christmas tree. We always tried to hide our poverty from the kids.”
No matter what your faith or religion, Easter is a time when families have holidays but not everyone can celebrate Easter with family celebrations – not everyone can afford it. As a community we are very fortunate by every measure, and it’s important that our young people understand how lucky they are in comparison to many other children and families here on the Sunshine Coast as well as in other parts of the world.
Easter is a time when we can do something to help others less fortunate. As John Templeton once said:
"Happiness comes from spiritual wealth, not material wealth... Happiness comes from giving, not getting. If we try hard to bring happiness to others, we cannot stop it from coming to us also. To get joy, we must give it, and to keep joy, we must scatter it."
So what can you do to make the life of someone less fortunate than you a little better at Easter?
(Andy Rooney)
Some people dream of being rich and famous, believing that all their heart’s desire will come to fruition. But does great wealth bring true happiness and contentment? One only has to scan the latest headlines here in Australia to find that great wealth and fame do not bring happiness -far from it - families can be torn apart by disputes about who should ‘have what’ in controversial and hotly contested wills and family trusts.
History’s pages reveal a litany of woes that have descended upon families of great wealth – everything from depression, suicide, murder and loss of fortune by careless or misguided spending or investments. It seems that having great wealth does not necessarily bring happiness like the fairytale life we dream about. While many of you may concede this point, I’m sure that one or two of you are thinking that ‘money can’t buy happiness, but it sure makes misery easier to live with’.
Most of us are lucky enough to have enough money to live comfortably without wanting for too much in our lives. Our happiness stems from our family and friends, our work and our leisure time and while we may still dream of winning that elusive Gold Lotto, or inheriting some fortune from a very distant relative, the reality is that we are happy enough with what we have.
Unfortunately, not everyone is in this fortunate position. It may surprise you to know that there are some people who live not far from us on the Sunshine Coast who are disadvantaged in very real terms. These people may be disadvantaged by one or more of the following factors: low income, no car, no family, physical disability, limited access to transport or health services or educational opportunities.
Of the 300,000 or so people living on the Sunshine Coast, there are according to the 2010 report from Uniting Care, Centre for Social Justice, around 20 percent of householders on the Sunshine Coast receiving less than $500 per week. One parent explained in her own words what this is like:
“We can’t support ourselves. Where I live cost $250 a fortnight. I only get $420 in unemployment benefit. How am I suppose to support myself and my kids in a house with that amount of money? I struggle to eat.”

On the Sunshine Coast, approximately 15 percent of families suffer unemployment. Children are often caught in desperate situations because of their parents’ circumstances and often these children live in single parent families. One person explained how they coped growing up as a child in poverty:
“I hid my poverty by never telling anyone where I lived and by never inviting anyone home.”
The elderly living on a pension are often caught in poverty. They worry about money constantly and coping is very stressful for them. They wonder whether they will have enough to get by each week. As one elderly man put it:
“I can afford ‘basics’ but I can’t afford new clothing. I don’t have enough money to go out. I worry about how I’m going to cope in the future.”
The really sad part of growing old, one man said, was that you become invisible.
“You are no longer worth anything when you are old. People don’t even see you anymore. When I walk down the street, no-one ever says ‘hello’. Some days I wait out the front of my flat, until the postman comes to the letterbox, so I can talk to him. He may be the only person I talk to some weeks.”
The people who are most disadvantaged are the elderly, the disabled, those on a pension, the unemployed, single parents and the very young born into families who are disadvantaged. Some of these families live in rented houses, but many others live in temporary accommodation – moving from one flat to another, or live in caravans, or cars, homeless shelters or at worse, on the streets and in parks.
On the Sunshine Coast, according to a specially commissioned Sunshine Coast Regional Council 2006 report, about 1700 people or more are homeless. About 1000 of these homeless people, live in caravan parks.
Disadvantaged people can live in desperate circumstances – some of their own making - but often in many other cases, it’s a result of loss of income, mental illness, or physical disabilities which makes it difficult to find or keep work and in some very sad cases, a combination of many of these factors. Despair, depression, worry, anxiety, hopelessness, hunger and stress are the emotional struggles of the disadvantaged.
There are certain times of the year, when poverty and disadvantage are more painful and stressful. Christmas and Easter are particularly difficult for disadvantaged families, where children are the ones who feel it more deeply. Many parents may try and protect children from their dire financial circumstances. One parent wrote:
“At Christmas, we came home with $14 in our pocket. We sat around and made a game of cutting out decorations to put on the Christmas tree. We always tried to hide our poverty from the kids.”
No matter what your faith or religion, Easter is a time when families have holidays but not everyone can celebrate Easter with family celebrations – not everyone can afford it. As a community we are very fortunate by every measure, and it’s important that our young people understand how lucky they are in comparison to many other children and families here on the Sunshine Coast as well as in other parts of the world.
Easter is a time when we can do something to help others less fortunate. As John Templeton once said:
"Happiness comes from spiritual wealth, not material wealth... Happiness comes from giving, not getting. If we try hard to bring happiness to others, we cannot stop it from coming to us also. To get joy, we must give it, and to keep joy, we must scatter it."
So what can you do to make the life of someone less fortunate than you a little better at Easter?
- Donate food items to the Salvation Army for distribution
- Volunteer to help some charities and your local church distribute food or simply offer some help to someone who might need it
- Get involved in the work of Rotary, Lions, Zonta or some other organisation that commits to helping others in need
There are many ways that we can get involved and make a difference to someone else's life. A little kindness and a little time can go a long way to helping others in need. What will you do to make a difference? It doesn't need to be a big or grand gesture, it could be a simple act of random kindness. Whether it's big or small donation, all of us can make a difference if we set our minds and hearts to it.
Karon Graham
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
The New Science of Learning - latest research
Don’t you love a challenge? When we are engaged in the pursuit of some ‘Holy Grail’ (like swashbuckling, archaeologist, Indiana Jones), our whole body and mind is absorbed by the best way to meet that challenge. Sir Ken Robinson talks about us being in the zone –or the ‘state of creative flow’.
For many creative people, sportsmen or women this is perhaps the greatest challenge, finding that single impetus or stimulus that drives us to exhaustion in perfecting our singing, or our golf swing, or perfecting the best mix of musical notes or songs, or our dance moves, or our drawing ability or our photographic skills to take that perfect shot. Our best learning and greatest creativity is sparked by being in “the zone”. Does practice make perfect? Well not necessarily, according to the latest research.
We have all heard the adage; we learn by doing. Yes it’s true but surprisingly, new research into the science of learning now reveals that we learn by watching too. According to Dr Anne Murphy Paul, who has just written a book about the subject, whether it’s a salsa teacher running through a dance sequence, or a tennis coach demonstrating the perfect backhand, or a science teacher conducting a dissection in front of a class, observing an expert at work is an opportunity to hone our own skills.
Paul maintains that this is particularly true for motor movements, and research in neuroscience is beginning to show why. She states that when we watch someone else’s motions, the parts of the brain that direct our own physical movements are activated. Observation accelerates the learning process because our brains are able to map others’ actions onto our own mental representations, making them more detailed and more accurate. Now I’m sure many of you may be thinking that all of the money paid to the golf professional has not resulted in a Greg Norman swing just yet, but despite this, the research is showing a clear correlation between the observations and the brain’s ability to absorb and direct our actions.
‘Couch potatoes’ beware, it’s not as easy as it sounds. While on the surface it appears that we can learn from observing experts, there is a catch. Research conducted by Professor of psychology, Scott Grafton, at the University of California also shows that we learn best when we engage a circuit in the brain whenever we observe movement, imagine performing it or actually engage in it ourselves. Scott Frey of the University of Oregon found through brain scans, that those people who had observed a person pulling apart a toy and putting it back together and told that they had to to do the task themselves, had greater brain activity in the region of the brain involved in motor learning, than the group that simply observed.
Similarly those people who don’t just play a piece of music for hours on end but instead undertake deliberate, painstaking practice, which involves a process of constant self-evaluation, of focusing on one’s weaknesses, results in better outcomes (superior playing skills), because the practice is about improving on and correcting one’s weaknesses.
There h
as been other groundbreaking research into the benefits of increased spatial learning and how it benefits a child’s learning and understanding of mathematics, science, technology and engineering. Nora Newcombe’s work on how children learn best in the early years highlighted that we best enhance the spatial learning in children by using hand gestures, use analogies and by using spatial language. The researchers found that when playing with blocks under interactive conditions, children hear the kind of language that helps them think about space, such as "over," "around" and "through."
"When parents use spatial language, they draw attention to spatial concepts," said Nora Newcombe, co-director of Temple's Infant Lab. "The development of a spatial vocabulary is critical for developing spatial ability and awareness."
She stresses the importance of play, particularly with puzzles, paper folding (origami for example) and block play but under specific guided play rather than ‘free’ play. "This study gives parents news they can use. It shows that, rather than leaving kids alone with a preassembled activity, interactive play that draws out conversation is best at facilitating spatial development," Newcombe said.
A recent “Time” magazine’s article: “Ten Ideas that are changing your life”, had at number three on the list, (and surprisingly not at number one), the change in the brain and the way we learn, as a result of mass consumption of knowledge from the internet and the almost total dependency on Google to answer all of life’s big and little questions. Are our heads, now, really in the clouds?
According to Betsy Sparrow, professor of psychology at Columbia University, skills like critical thinking and analysis must develop in the context of facts, because the evidence to date is showing some decline in our skills to memorise and to recall information from our long term memory. Sparrow points out that we need something to think and reason about and these facts can’t be Googled as we go; they need to be stored in the original hard-drive, our long term memory. Especially in the case of children, ‘factual knowledge must precede skill."
Adults too, according to Daniel Willingham, a professor of psychology at the University of Virginia, need to recruit a supply of stored knowledge in order to situate and evaluate new information we encounter. As he quips:
“You can’t Google context.”
According to Andrew Meltzoff, co director of the University of Washington’s Institute of Learning and Brain Sciences in Seattle, the ‘new science of learning’ reveals that :
· Learning is computational and that infants and toddlers posses innate capabilities to see and hear patterns. By reinforcing these capabilities in the very young we can shape and aid learning in the child.
· Learning is social and people learn better through social cues. According to Meltzoff: social factors play an important role in life-long learning.
· Learning is driven by brain circuitry and brain cells are fired up during both perception and action overlap in people, which allows students to identify with their teachers and speeds learning.
It seems that scientists are now quietly tackling education issues, offering up new tools, new approaches and even new disciplines, like the new science of learning which is a convergence of the thinking and research of psychologists, neuroscientists, roboticists and teachers. In time more research will reveal the wonders of learning and the practical applications of this research will be absorbed into the teaching and learning programs.
Melttzoff, when asked in an interview about the age old question of whether learning is primarily nature or nurture, had this to say:
“There is no real conflict between nature and nurture, no conflict between biology and culture. What is unique about human biology is that we depend on other people for learning. We are influenced deeply by our teachers, parents and peers. I like to say that we humans are born to learn.”
How true!
Karon Graham
For many creative people, sportsmen or women this is perhaps the greatest challenge, finding that single impetus or stimulus that drives us to exhaustion in perfecting our singing, or our golf swing, or perfecting the best mix of musical notes or songs, or our dance moves, or our drawing ability or our photographic skills to take that perfect shot. Our best learning and greatest creativity is sparked by being in “the zone”. Does practice make perfect? Well not necessarily, according to the latest research.
We have all heard the adage; we learn by doing. Yes it’s true but surprisingly, new research into the science of learning now reveals that we learn by watching too. According to Dr Anne Murphy Paul, who has just written a book about the subject, whether it’s a salsa teacher running through a dance sequence, or a tennis coach demonstrating the perfect backhand, or a science teacher conducting a dissection in front of a class, observing an expert at work is an opportunity to hone our own skills.
Paul maintains that this is particularly true for motor movements, and research in neuroscience is beginning to show why. She states that when we watch someone else’s motions, the parts of the brain that direct our own physical movements are activated. Observation accelerates the learning process because our brains are able to map others’ actions onto our own mental representations, making them more detailed and more accurate. Now I’m sure many of you may be thinking that all of the money paid to the golf professional has not resulted in a Greg Norman swing just yet, but despite this, the research is showing a clear correlation between the observations and the brain’s ability to absorb and direct our actions.
‘Couch potatoes’ beware, it’s not as easy as it sounds. While on the surface it appears that we can learn from observing experts, there is a catch. Research conducted by Professor of psychology, Scott Grafton, at the University of California also shows that we learn best when we engage a circuit in the brain whenever we observe movement, imagine performing it or actually engage in it ourselves. Scott Frey of the University of Oregon found through brain scans, that those people who had observed a person pulling apart a toy and putting it back together and told that they had to to do the task themselves, had greater brain activity in the region of the brain involved in motor learning, than the group that simply observed.
Similarly those people who don’t just play a piece of music for hours on end but instead undertake deliberate, painstaking practice, which involves a process of constant self-evaluation, of focusing on one’s weaknesses, results in better outcomes (superior playing skills), because the practice is about improving on and correcting one’s weaknesses.
There h
as been other groundbreaking research into the benefits of increased spatial learning and how it benefits a child’s learning and understanding of mathematics, science, technology and engineering. Nora Newcombe’s work on how children learn best in the early years highlighted that we best enhance the spatial learning in children by using hand gestures, use analogies and by using spatial language. The researchers found that when playing with blocks under interactive conditions, children hear the kind of language that helps them think about space, such as "over," "around" and "through.""When parents use spatial language, they draw attention to spatial concepts," said Nora Newcombe, co-director of Temple's Infant Lab. "The development of a spatial vocabulary is critical for developing spatial ability and awareness."
She stresses the importance of play, particularly with puzzles, paper folding (origami for example) and block play but under specific guided play rather than ‘free’ play. "This study gives parents news they can use. It shows that, rather than leaving kids alone with a preassembled activity, interactive play that draws out conversation is best at facilitating spatial development," Newcombe said.
A recent “Time” magazine’s article: “Ten Ideas that are changing your life”, had at number three on the list, (and surprisingly not at number one), the change in the brain and the way we learn, as a result of mass consumption of knowledge from the internet and the almost total dependency on Google to answer all of life’s big and little questions. Are our heads, now, really in the clouds?
According to Betsy Sparrow, professor of psychology at Columbia University, skills like critical thinking and analysis must develop in the context of facts, because the evidence to date is showing some decline in our skills to memorise and to recall information from our long term memory. Sparrow points out that we need something to think and reason about and these facts can’t be Googled as we go; they need to be stored in the original hard-drive, our long term memory. Especially in the case of children, ‘factual knowledge must precede skill."
Adults too, according to Daniel Willingham, a professor of psychology at the University of Virginia, need to recruit a supply of stored knowledge in order to situate and evaluate new information we encounter. As he quips:
“You can’t Google context.”
According to Andrew Meltzoff, co director of the University of Washington’s Institute of Learning and Brain Sciences in Seattle, the ‘new science of learning’ reveals that :
· Learning is computational and that infants and toddlers posses innate capabilities to see and hear patterns. By reinforcing these capabilities in the very young we can shape and aid learning in the child.
· Learning is social and people learn better through social cues. According to Meltzoff: social factors play an important role in life-long learning.
· Learning is driven by brain circuitry and brain cells are fired up during both perception and action overlap in people, which allows students to identify with their teachers and speeds learning.
It seems that scientists are now quietly tackling education issues, offering up new tools, new approaches and even new disciplines, like the new science of learning which is a convergence of the thinking and research of psychologists, neuroscientists, roboticists and teachers. In time more research will reveal the wonders of learning and the practical applications of this research will be absorbed into the teaching and learning programs.
Melttzoff, when asked in an interview about the age old question of whether learning is primarily nature or nurture, had this to say:
“There is no real conflict between nature and nurture, no conflict between biology and culture. What is unique about human biology is that we depend on other people for learning. We are influenced deeply by our teachers, parents and peers. I like to say that we humans are born to learn.”
How true!
Karon Graham
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Did You Know? Facts about Reading.
A single moment of understanding can flood a whole life with meaning. (Anon)Did you know, that across the world, children who read the most read the best regardless of social levels, income levels or where they live?
Did you know that reading is one of the most important skills a child can learn because it will be difficult for a child to master any subject without knowing how to read?
Did you know that fifteen-year-old students whose parents often read books with them during their first year of primary school show markedly higher scores (in PISA 2009) than students whose parents read with them infrequently or not at all.
Did you know that listening comprehension comes before reading comprehension and that you must hear a word before you can say it or read and write it? According to Jim Trelease, author of New York Times bestseller, “The Read Aloud Handbook”, (from which many of the facts in this article come), there’s a “word reservoir” in a child’s brain and one thing that parents can do, is to pour as many words into that brain so that it overflows into speech, then reading and writing.Did you know that by age four, high-income children have heard 45 million words from their families and low-income children have heard just 13 million? That’s a 32 million word difference according to Hart and Risley’s “Meaningful Differences”.
Did you know that children learn an average of 4,000 to 12,000 new words each year as a result of book reading?
Did you know that children read on one level and listen on a higher level and it’s not until Year 8 that the reading level catches up to the listening level?
Did you know that children who grow up in homes where books are plentiful go further in school than those who don't and have the highest reading scores? Children with low-education families can do as well as children with high-education families if they have access to books at home.
Did you know that research shows that those children who watch the most television, know the least. The average child spends 1460 hours a year watching television, DVDs and playing computer games, equal to watching “Gone With the Wind” 392 times a year.
Did you know that students who read widely and frequently are higher achievers than students who read rarely and narrowly?
Did you know that studies have proven that increased family engagement in educational programs is linked with increases in child reading achievement and other academic successes?
Did you know that parents are the key reading role models? High frequency reading parents are six times more likely to have high frequency reading children.
In the National Year of Reading, 2012, it’s rather appropriate that we focus on the benefits of reading. There are so many distractions that take our children away from reading books and magazines these days. Television, computer games, movies and a raft of outdoor activities results in many children spending less time reading books or magazines, for pleasure.
There are books which can change our perspective on life, open our eyes to new experiences and emotions, bring comfort when we are sad, bring hope when we are down, bring joy and excitement at new possibilities and allow us to escape to another world or country without even leaving home. As Edward P Morgan wrote:
A book is the only place in which you can examine a fragile thought without breaking it, or explore an explosive idea without fear it will go off in your face . . . It is one of the few havens remaining where a man's [or woman’s] mind can get both provocation and privacy.
Reading books to our children, even more importantly, allows us to bond with our children and share experiences because of the opportunity to relate the story to our own life and day to day events, which in other circumstances, may never have been discussed with our child.
Reading books to our children, even more importantly, allows us to bond with our children and share experiences because of the opportunity to relate the story to our own life and day to day events, which in other circumstances, may never have been discussed with our child.
The process of reading and the joy of reading are inextricably interwoven. By developing a love of reading in young children we are allowing them to experience more of life than what otherwise may be possible. Understanding and empathising with the emotions and thinking of characters or real life people in books we read is but one way of developing a greater depth of understanding of oneself. As the wise Chang Ch’ao wrote:
Reading books in one's youth is like looking at the moon through a crevice;
reading books in middle age is like looking at the moon in one's courtyard;
and reading books in old age is like looking at the moon on an open terrace.
This is because the depth of benefits of reading varies in proportion to the
depth of one's own experience.
Over time, with greater experience, our understanding deepens and in the end, we become a better person and a wiser person for understanding the perspectives of others – lessons learned personally or vicariously through the books we read. Celebrate reading by reading in this, the Year of Reading.
reading books in middle age is like looking at the moon in one's courtyard;
and reading books in old age is like looking at the moon on an open terrace.
This is because the depth of benefits of reading varies in proportion to the
depth of one's own experience.
Over time, with greater experience, our understanding deepens and in the end, we become a better person and a wiser person for understanding the perspectives of others – lessons learned personally or vicariously through the books we read. Celebrate reading by reading in this, the Year of Reading.
Karon Graham
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Friendships and Friends

“A friend is somebody you need bad, and sometimes he is very busy but he helps you anyway. A friend is somebody who likes me and I like them back. You could be friends for a long time, like twenty weeks.”
(A 9 year old boy’s explanation of what a friend is to him.)
Anita Gurian, noted psychologist recently wrote an excellent article: “Friends and Friendships” about the meanings of friendships. It’s interesting to read how young children’s perception of friendship changes over time. Gurian comments that at four years of age, children define a friend as someone who happens to be near them or whose toys they like. Five year olds and six year olds, she explains, focus on their own needs. They begin to realise that someone else may have a different point of view, but they don’t realise that friendship is an ongoing process.
By age 9 and 10, children see that friendships are an ongoing collaboration that allows them to see the other person’s point of view, share feelings, help each other and show interest in each other’s activities but may exclude others. At this age, children are also less reliant on the security of family and they form ties with their peers. From 12 years of age, teenagers recognize and value the complexity of human relationships. This change is evident from a 12 year old girl’s quote about her friend:
(A 9 year old boy’s explanation of what a friend is to him.)
Anita Gurian, noted psychologist recently wrote an excellent article: “Friends and Friendships” about the meanings of friendships. It’s interesting to read how young children’s perception of friendship changes over time. Gurian comments that at four years of age, children define a friend as someone who happens to be near them or whose toys they like. Five year olds and six year olds, she explains, focus on their own needs. They begin to realise that someone else may have a different point of view, but they don’t realise that friendship is an ongoing process.
By age 9 and 10, children see that friendships are an ongoing collaboration that allows them to see the other person’s point of view, share feelings, help each other and show interest in each other’s activities but may exclude others. At this age, children are also less reliant on the security of family and they form ties with their peers. From 12 years of age, teenagers recognize and value the complexity of human relationships. This change is evident from a 12 year old girl’s quote about her friend:
“We understand we’re both individuals and have different feelings about things. No matter how stupid my ideas are, like when I’m working on a project, my friend still listens and she doesn’t tease me about it. You take a chance with a good friend; you can’t be mad at her when she goes out with other friends too.”
Not all teenagers are as understanding as this young girl and often changing friendships become a source of conflict and misery for teenagers, particularly if they feel they are being excluded by a ‘friend’ or from a group of friends. There is a great deal written about bullying behaviours and young people are very quick to make judgments about bullying behaviours these days. However, sometimes it’s not so much about bullying behaviour, as much as a fear of rejection and a lack of confidence in a young person that causes them to struggle socially with other children. As one psychologist points out:
“Confidence, most would agree, makes social life a lot smoother. It also makes it a lot safer too.”
Don’t get me wrong, I am not suggesting that some young people do not exhibit bullying behaviours, but it seems to me that many people use the word ‘bullying’, when in reality they are talking about a falling out of two or more friends; there is a difference. Bullying behaviours are persistent and relentless behaviours, designed to demoralise and demean another person either physically or verbally.
A lack of social skills, on the other hand, can result in some form of rejection or difficulty in making and keeping friends. The point being, that the friends are not being ‘bullies’, they are exhibiting normal relationship behaviour, where friendships change and are like shifting sands of allegiance. Friends fall into and out of friendship for no particular reason – sometimes justified and in other cases not.
We now know, from extensive research carried out by the National Institute of Health in the 1990s, that our brains undergo a massive reorganisation between our 12th and 25th years. According to a recent article: “The New Science of the Teenage Brain” in the “National Geographic”, (October 2011 issue), the brain doesn’t grow very much (it’s already 90% of its full size) but the brain undergoes extensive remodelling, resembling a network and wiring upgrade.
This process of maturation, once thought to be finished by elementary school continues throughout adolescence. Stronger links also develop between the hippocampus, a sort of memory directory, and frontal areas that set goals and weigh different agendas; as a result, we get better at integrating memory and experience into our decisions. According to Dobbs, these connections allow us to generate and weigh up far more variables and agendas than before.
This development of the brain, allows us to get better at balancing impulse, desire, goals, self-interest, rules, and ethics, generating behaviour that is more complex and sometimes, (not as often as most parents would hope for but none-the-less), more sensible. Psychologists tell us that excitement, novelty, risk taking and the company of peers does add up to doing foolish new stuff with friends, however; on the flipside, these same traits define adolescence make us more adaptive as human beings.
Parents can help young children develop better social skills and in turn help your son or daughter develop more self-confidence. Building greater resilience is also crucial at this developmental stage and parents can best do this by allowing your child to try and resolve an issue with a friend without the parent intervening. If your child asks for help, then of course it is appropriate to sit down, listen to the problem and help your son or daughter develop appropriate strategies. Young children may need to practise saying the right words to communicate to another child how they are feeling and parents can certainly help in this regard.
Research shows that those children with the most confidence, adept social skills and good behaviour will make more friends and keep more friends. Some suggestions and tips to give your son or daughter for making good friends, by psychologist Dr Angela Wilson:
· Smile when you see a person you know or recognize.
· Use a person’s name when talking to him or her.
· Ask friends for their phone number(s) so you can telephone them and their e-mail address so you can message them.
· Find out what they like and talk to them about things that interest them.
· Ask them about their favourite piece of music or a favourite book they have read or their favourite sport or their favourite place.
· Be interested in the other person.
· Discover things you may share in common, like playing handball.
· Talk a little about yourself, but do not talk about very personal things until you have known the person for some time.
· Remember, you have to make an effort and put out the hand of friendship.
· Make sure you do what you have said you will do – always keep your promise.
· Be prepared to admit when you are wrong.
· Say sorry if you think you may have hurt someone’s feelings.
· Be prepared to laugh with your friends at yourself when you do or say something unusual or silly. Say something like “Oops, silly me!”
· Remember that most friends are just like you. They may forget to do things or they may forget to ring you. Nobody is perfect. Be forgiving.
There is a PowerPoint presentation on “What it is to be a good friend” on my blog that I used on Assembly this week; parents may wish to view this presentation and discuss it with your son or daughter.
Monday, February 27, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
